Cotton Ginning Program in Mississippi County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 373
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Mississippi County, Arkansas totaled $4,024,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | D Blankenship Farms Inc | Dell, AR 72426 | $53,847 |
22 | Justin Wildy Farms Prtshp | Manila, AR 72442 | $52,514 |
23 | Gordon Miller Farms Partnership | Leachville, AR 72438 | $52,272 |
24 | Perry Dixon Jr | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $50,894 |
25 | Rotan Planting Company | Osceola, AR 72370 | $49,268 |
26 | Harry Dixon Jr | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $47,020 |
27 | Caleb D Miller | Leachville, AR 72438 | $45,663 |
28 | Dwight Jackson | Manila, AR 72442 | $45,455 |
29 | Earl Wildy Inc | Manila, AR 72442 | $45,411 |
30 | Hopper & Hopper Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $44,112 |
31 | D & K Farms Inc | Dell, AR 72426 | $42,312 |
32 | Chad A Jackson | Leachville, AR 72438 | $42,131 |
33 | Brandon C Snider | Leachville, AR 72438 | $39,874 |
34 | Senter & Sons Gin Inc | Osceola, AR 72370 | $37,862 |
35 | Henderson Ag Service Inc | Keiser, AR 72351 | $37,658 |
36 | G-4 Farms | Mountain Home, AR 72653 | $37,407 |
37 | A & M Farms Inc | Dell, AR 72426 | $34,734 |
38 | Watermark Farms LLC | Blytheville, AR 72316 | $32,244 |
39 | Billy Crosskno & Son Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $30,052 |
40 | Brandon And Justin Veach Farms | Manila, AR 72442 | $28,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”