Market Gains in Mississippi County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 888
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Mississippi County, Arkansas totaled $16,795,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darrell Brothers Farms Ptr | Luxora, AR 72358 | $158,329 |
22 | Double Bridges Farms Partnership | Luxora, AR 72358 | $155,458 |
23 | G-4 Farms | Mountain Home, AR 72653 | $140,995 |
24 | C & L Farms Partnership | Osceola, AR 72370 | $139,322 |
25 | Nathan Long | Burdette, AR 72321 | $132,624 |
26 | The Rose Company | Manila, AR 72442 | $132,316 |
27 | Ledbetter Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $130,895 |
28 | Senter Land Co Inc | Keiser, AR 72351 | $130,519 |
29 | Todd Edwards Farms | Leachville, AR 72438 | $130,210 |
30 | Rauls Farms II | Leachville, AR 72438 | $125,481 |
31 | Billy Crosskno & Son Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $117,654 |
32 | M B White Farms Inc | Osceola, AR 72370 | $117,061 |
33 | R & R Farms G P | Leachville, AR 72438 | $115,474 |
34 | Dcg Planting Co Inc | Dell, AR 72426 | $112,463 |
35 | Buffalo Island Farms LLC | Leachville, AR 72438 | $109,495 |
36 | Dwight Jackson | Manila, AR 72442 | $109,266 |
37 | Steve L Baugher | Manila, AR 72442 | $105,687 |
38 | Lammers Farms Ptrs | Dell, AR 72426 | $104,001 |
39 | Langston And Elliott | Blytheville, AR 72316 | $103,117 |
40 | Travis Senter II | Osceola, AR 72370 | $102,478 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”