Farm Subsidy information
Phillips County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Phillips County, Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 342
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Phillips County, Arkansas totaled $29,140,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Griffin Farms South | Helena, AR 72342 | $2,779,247 |
2 | Deline Farms South | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,699,700 |
3 | Rdfarm Group | Marvell, AR 72366 | $779,038 |
4 | Deline Farms North | Charleston, MO 63834 | $619,464 |
5 | Deline Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $616,849 |
6 | Coffee Creek Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $548,758 |
7 | Whitetail Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $504,772 |
8 | C & A Heidelberger Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $474,722 |
9 | Cypert Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $356,243 |
10 | E And B Hindsley Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $287,269 |
11 | Tmg Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $262,113 |
12 | Swindle Farms | Elaine, AR 72333 | $239,509 |
13 | Bartlett Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $224,201 |
14 | Clay Ridge Farms | West Helena, AR 72390 | $208,060 |
15 | Rohrscheib Family Farms | Lexa, AR 72355 | $195,801 |
16 | Hillside Farms | Elaine, AR 72333 | $189,313 |
17 | Thomas Farms | Lexa, AR 72355 | $178,832 |
18 | Rickey Helton Farms | West Helena, AR 72390 | $170,692 |
19 | D And C Warren Farms | Lambrook, AR 72353 | $154,151 |
20 | Kendall Farms | Poplar Grove, AR 72374 | $150,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>