Farm Subsidy information
Pulaski County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Pulaski County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 786
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pulaski County, Arkansas totaled $72,811,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bat Farms Ptnrshp | Scott, AR 72142 | $579,512 |
22 | David A Lanehart | Keo, AR 72083 | $566,502 |
23 | David Carter Farms Jv | England, AR 72046 | $553,747 |
24 | Charles J Walderns Jr Farms Partn | Woodson, AR 72180 | $550,296 |
25 | James V & Cathy M Webb J V | Scott, AR 72142 | $548,806 |
26 | Tyler Henderson Farms Ptshp | England, AR 72046 | $543,060 |
27 | Craig Planting Co Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $543,015 |
28 | Old River Farming Co Inc | England, AR 72046 | $534,144 |
29 | Albert R Duck | England, AR 72046 | $528,165 |
30 | Ronnie Walderns | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $519,201 |
31 | Larry A Odom | Little Rock, AR 72210 | $516,129 |
32 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $501,559 |
33 | Floyd H Fulkerson | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $498,165 |
34 | Bobby Joe Turner Jr | England, AR 72046 | $494,300 |
35 | John W Morgan | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $489,655 |
36 | Wilk Brothers Ptnrshp | North Little Rock, AR 72113 | $486,856 |
37 | Mark & Sharon Estes Farms | Scott, AR 72142 | $485,449 |
38 | Vic Shadell | North Little Rock, AR 72113 | $481,183 |
39 | Kevin Thomas | North Little Rock, AR 72114 | $480,474 |
40 | Jack Tyler Family LLC | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $454,635 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”