Total Commodity Programs in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 451
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $9,482,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Turnrows Joint Venture | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $90,922 |
22 | Lizzaclaire Farms Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $88,510 |
23 | Doylene Hinze | Heth, AR 72346 | $87,231 |
24 | Hobbs Family Farm Prtnshp | Colt, AR 72326 | $84,195 |
25 | R & V Hall Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $82,608 |
26 | D & D Gore Farm | Palestine, AR 72372 | $80,926 |
27 | Carey Farms Partnerhsip | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $78,413 |
28 | Red Oak Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $78,155 |
29 | B & G Farm Partnership | Heth, AR 72346 | $74,638 |
30 | J T Jarrett & Sons | Colt, AR 72326 | $73,805 |
31 | Southern Bancorp Bank ** | Trumann, AR 72472 | $72,597 |
32 | P K Buerkle Farms Inc | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $63,837 |
33 | L & P Farms Partnership | Hughes, AR 72348 | $62,527 |
34 | Heritage Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $62,449 |
35 | Brian Mcdaniel Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $60,566 |
36 | Weeks Farm | Widener, AR 72394 | $60,163 |
37 | Michaelis Farms Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $59,372 |
38 | Wheatley Farm Inc | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $57,051 |
39 | Mcdaniel Farms | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $55,433 |
40 | Woodson Hill Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $55,129 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”