Farm Subsidy information

Saint Francis County, Arkansas

Total Subsidies in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,147

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $470,982,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
41Double H Farms IncHeth, AR 72346$1,838,109
42Mcgraw Planting Co A PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$1,827,338
43Woodson Hill FarmsHeth, AR 72346$1,817,582
44Huckaba Farms PartnershipForrest City, AR 72335$1,813,631
45Wheatley Farm IncHot Springs, AR 71913$1,795,956
46Byron E Holmes JrForrest City, AR 72336$1,730,262
47Donnie Burns FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$1,691,921
48S And L Farms PartnershipMarion, AR 72364$1,675,777
49Two Rivers AgBrinkley, AR 72021$1,625,652
50Otter Pond PartnershipWynne, AR 72396$1,598,392
51Sam Tracy Dillahunty SrHughes, AR 72348$1,578,775
52Daren Fowler FarmsWheatley, AR 72392$1,567,908
53Double R Farms IncWheatley, AR 72392$1,566,483
54T & G Clegg Family Farms PtrColt, AR 72326$1,537,747
55Jayroe Farming PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$1,519,627
56Johnny D WestHeth, AR 72346$1,475,463
57Walker Farms Ninety SixColt, AR 72326$1,462,370
58J E Lindsey Family Limited PartneForrest City, AR 72335$1,441,561
59Wright Land Co IncWidener, AR 72394$1,394,895
60Caleb Jones FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$1,394,034

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag