Water Bank Program in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 111
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in California totaled $457,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hollister L&c C/o Louis Serratto | Daly City, CA 94015 | $25,430 |
2 | Duncan Mccormack | El Macero, CA 95618 | $18,314 |
3 | Gustine Land & Cattle Inc | Soquel, CA 95073 | $17,648 |
4 | Wild Goose Club | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $17,000 |
5 | Salinas Land & Cattle Inc. | Salinas, CA 93902 | $16,934 |
6 | Glide In Ranch Inc | Sacramento, CA 95852 | $14,093 |
7 | Sacramento Outing Club | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $12,648 |
8 | Butte Lodge Outing Club Inc | Colusa, CA 95932 | $11,859 |
9 | White Mallard Inc | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $11,747 |
10 | Lonetree Land & Cattle Inc | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $10,798 |
11 | San Joaquin Wetland Farms | San Carlos, CA 94070 | $9,979 |
12 | Gables Land & Cattle | Fresno, CA 93720 | $9,901 |
13 | Big Water Land Co Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $9,408 |
14 | Bowles Farming Company Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $8,763 |
15 | Greenhead Land Co | San Francisco, CA 94111 | $8,500 |
16 | Colusa Shooting Club Inc | Colusa, CA 95932 | $8,279 |
17 | Yolo Flyway Farms Inc | San Rafael, CA 94903 | $7,645 |
18 | Klamath L & C Inc | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $6,963 |
19 | Field & Tule Club | Woodland, CA 95695 | $6,800 |
20 | Sutter Buttes Outing Club | Roseville, CA 95661 | $6,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>