Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 21,262
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in California totaled $1,410,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wagner Dairy Gp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $794,789 |
22 | Ahlem Farms Jerseys | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $759,235 |
23 | Terra Linda Farms I | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $752,383 |
24 | Robert Gioletti & Sons Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $751,572 |
25 | Hoogendam Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $750,000 |
26 | M & K Farms | Tulare, CA 93275 | $750,000 |
27 | Four J Farms | Tipton, CA 93272 | $750,000 |
28 | A-bar Ag Enterprises | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $750,000 |
29 | V A Rodden Inc | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $750,000 |
30 | Valley Fresh Foods Inc | Turlock, CA 95381 | $750,000 |
31 | Harlan Family Ranch Inc | Woodland, CA 95695 | $750,000 |
32 | Mariani Nut Co Inc | Winters, CA 95694 | $750,000 |
33 | Coburn Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $750,000 |
34 | Live Oak Farms Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $750,000 |
35 | Leavens Ranches LLC | Ventura, CA 93007 | $750,000 |
36 | Ikeda Bros. | Oceano, CA 93475 | $750,000 |
37 | Thomson International Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $750,000 |
38 | L & J Vanderham Dairy | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $750,000 |
39 | Costa Farms Inc | Soledad, CA 93960 | $750,000 |
40 | Anthony Vineyards Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93389 | $750,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”