Conservation Reserve Program in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,343
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $122,851,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marshall Arnold Partnership | Colusa, CA 95932 | $788,437 |
22 | Michael Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $775,346 |
23 | R Y Ranch & Hay Partnership | Yreka, CA 96097 | $761,274 |
24 | Janet Klock | Tempe, AZ 85283 | $751,908 |
25 | Sill Properties Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93301 | $693,525 |
26 | Miller & King | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $691,304 |
27 | Lonnie Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $680,391 |
28 | Kenneth Eng Jr | San Antonio, TX 78229 | $669,914 |
29 | Lazy Jt Land And Cattle Lp | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $668,935 |
30 | Marita E York-minnear | Montague, CA 96064 | $628,805 |
31 | Bogus Creek Ranch | Montague, CA 96064 | $617,980 |
32 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $615,820 |
33 | Nels Beck & Son | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $609,716 |
34 | Cheryl Skelton | Shandon, CA 93461 | $572,477 |
35 | Kelly Miller Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $566,072 |
36 | Gustine Land & Cattle Inc | Soquel, CA 95073 | $558,387 |
37 | Maher F Habashi | Huntersville, NC 28078 | $541,821 |
38 | Ray V York | Montague, CA 96064 | $531,166 |
39 | Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $527,498 |
40 | Darrell Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $519,777 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”