Water Bank Program in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 111
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in California totaled $457,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mesquite Sportsmens Club | Fresno, CA 93703 | $3,634 |
42 | Coaches Gun Club Inc | Fresno, CA 93710 | $3,629 |
43 | Winchester Gun Cl | San Bruno, CA 94066 | $3,536 |
44 | Refuge Gun Club Inc | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $3,536 |
45 | Lucky Seven Gun Club | Carson City, NV 89703 | $3,509 |
46 | Santa Fe Land & Cattle Co Inc | Merced, CA 95340 | $3,402 |
47 | Santa Fe Sierra Inc | Santa Barbara, CA 93140 | $3,382 |
48 | Cherokee Cattle Ranch | Palo Alto, CA 94302 | $3,354 |
49 | Turlock Cattle Co Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $3,300 |
50 | Deer Park Prop C/o Jeff Kerry | San Leandro, CA 94577 | $3,226 |
51 | Ramogni Land Company | Oakland, CA 94611 | $3,024 |
52 | Trust Of Jess Cave | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,992 |
53 | Lawrence C Ludwig | Fair Oaks, CA 95628 | $2,784 |
54 | Ralph Bogner | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 | $2,696 |
55 | Yolo Basin Farms Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95624 | $2,686 |
56 | Theodore A Dallas | Livingston, CA 95334 | $2,598 |
57 | Liatnip Inc | Danville, CA 94526 | $2,464 |
58 | Big Lake Farms A General Partners | Ross, CA 94957 | $2,320 |
59 | Robert J Nardi | San Ramon, CA 94583 | $2,271 |
60 | Santa Rosa Tule Duck Club | Williams, CA 95987 | $2,217 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”