Conservation Reserve Program in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,343
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $122,851,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | D A Rominger & Sons Inc | Winters, CA 95694 | $515,311 |
42 | Raymond O Dauth 2014 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $513,394 |
43 | Paul W Ernst 2006 Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $500,521 |
44 | Sylva Bros | Montague, CA 96064 | $496,948 |
45 | Stacy Miller | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $495,633 |
46 | Work Family Estate Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $490,993 |
47 | Nic E Lewis | Pismo Beach, CA 93449 | $490,428 |
48 | Mcdonald Ranch Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $476,450 |
49 | Cedric Grant | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $466,826 |
50 | Vineyard Hill | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $466,089 |
51 | Johansing Farms LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $458,678 |
52 | Mitch Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $456,714 |
53 | Twisselman/clark | Shandon, CA 93461 | $453,724 |
54 | Donald E Furtado | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $453,454 |
55 | Farris Hillside LLC | Fresno, CA 93720 | $453,230 |
56 | Beck Ranch LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $450,216 |
57 | Nigel Macrae | Las Vegas, NV 89130 | $438,301 |
58 | T Franklin Twisselman Jr | Cholame, CA 93461 | $435,275 |
59 | Grant Family Trust | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $429,932 |
60 | Schwarzgruber & Sons | Woodland, CA 95695 | $424,922 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”