Direct Payment Program in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 19,056
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in California totaled $1,672,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dublin Farms | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $5,612,582 |
2 | Colusa Indian Community Council | Colusa, CA 95932 | $4,966,733 |
3 | Buttonwillow Land And Cattle Co | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $3,870,749 |
4 | R Gorrill Ranch Enterprises | Durham, CA 95938 | $3,621,439 |
5 | Sandridge Partners Lp | Los Altos, CA 94022 | $3,383,020 |
6 | Hansen Ranches | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $3,305,307 |
7 | S J R Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $3,228,148 |
8 | Cloverdale Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $3,170,738 |
9 | Knight Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $3,047,925 |
10 | Rolling Hills Farms | Oceano, CA 93445 | $3,036,619 |
11 | E Franklin Larrabee & Assoc | Chico, CA 95926 | $3,021,771 |
12 | District 108 Farms | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $2,965,188 |
13 | Arnold Hoffart Mark Hoffart & Nei | Robbins, CA 95676 | $2,776,085 |
14 | Fisher Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $2,760,758 |
15 | S B & L La Grande | Williams, CA 95987 | $2,699,177 |
16 | Valley Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,674,424 |
17 | Canal Farms | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $2,523,917 |
18 | Starrh & Starrh Ctn Growers | Shafter, CA 93263 | $2,460,013 |
19 | Faxon Farms | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,256,604 |
20 | Roduner Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $2,199,860 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>