Water Bank Program in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 111
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in California totaled $457,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Charles R Schwab | San Francisco, CA 94119 | $6,494 |
| 22 | Stillbow Ranch Inc | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $6,307 |
| 23 | Skyraker Duck Club Inc C/o Ray Th | Davis, CA 95618 | $5,780 |
| 24 | Bardin Duck Club | Salinas, CA 93912 | $5,558 |
| 25 | Cortina Land & Cattle Co | Carmichael, CA 95608 | $5,355 |
| 26 | E Gustine Dk Cl | Santa Cruz, CA 95062 | $5,240 |
| 27 | North Butte Inc | San Carlos, CA 94070 | $5,165 |
| 28 | Club Cazadero | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $4,676 |
| 29 | Reeves Lake Land Co | Fresno, CA 93720 | $4,626 |
| 30 | Meline & Rabo Ptshp | Durham, CA 95938 | $4,420 |
| 31 | Capital Outing Gun Club | Richmond, CA 94801 | $4,393 |
| 32 | Double D L&c | Los Altos, CA 94022 | $4,359 |
| 33 | Sanborn Slough Farm | Chico, CA 95928 | $4,325 |
| 34 | Three Rivers Ranch Ptnshp | Fresno, CA 93728 | $4,220 |
| 35 | Channel Ranch | Alamo, CA 94507 | $4,202 |
| 36 | Chester N Vogt | Elk Creek, CA 95939 | $4,200 |
| 37 | Eureka Farms Duck Club Jv | Soquel, CA 95073 | $3,892 |
| 38 | Lucky 12 Duck Club | Mountain View, CA 94040 | $3,830 |
| 39 | Riverfield Cattle Co Inc | San Marino, CA 91108 | $3,752 |
| 40 | James Walker | Sequim, WA 98382 | $3,723 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf