Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Colusa County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 803
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $16,870,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Peter D Peterson | Chico, CA 95927 | $132,114 |
22 | Sean V Doherty Farms | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $132,011 |
23 | Mark & Sandy Ottenwalter | Colusa, CA 95932 | $129,693 |
24 | M & R Lagrande | Williams, CA 95987 | $129,168 |
25 | King Golden State Orchards LLC | Colusa, CA 95932 | $126,743 |
26 | Myers Seed | Colusa, CA 95932 | $124,814 |
27 | Daniel And Amie Charter | Colusa, CA 95932 | $119,134 |
28 | River Vista Farms | Colusa, CA 95932 | $118,663 |
29 | Wildwood Orchards | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $116,164 |
30 | James Charter | Williams, CA 95987 | $110,084 |
31 | L & M Farms | Williams, CA 95987 | $108,166 |
32 | Chamisal Creek Ranch LLC | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $106,992 |
33 | Wallace Brothers | Sutter, CA 95982 | $106,208 |
34 | Jack D King | Johnstown, NE 69214 | $106,196 |
35 | Frank J & Juanita Nobriga Living Trust Nobriga | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $104,891 |
36 | M & C Myers Inc | Colusa, CA 95932 | $104,697 |
37 | Thunder Nut, LLC | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $103,743 |
38 | Faxon Farms | Colusa, CA 95932 | $100,925 |
39 | Amy Sue Peterson Trust | Chico, CA 95927 | $100,184 |
40 | Michael Andrew Peterson Trust | Chico, CA 95927 | $100,184 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”