Water Bank Program in Colusa County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $78,678 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Butte Lodge Outing Club Inc | Colusa, CA 95932 | $11,859 |
2 | White Mallard Inc | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $11,747 |
3 | Colusa Shooting Club Inc | Colusa, CA 95932 | $8,279 |
4 | Cortina Land & Cattle Co | Carmichael, CA 95608 | $5,355 |
5 | Capital Outing Gun Club | Richmond, CA 94801 | $4,393 |
6 | Refuge Gun Club Inc | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $3,536 |
7 | Lucky Seven Gun Club | Carson City, NV 89703 | $3,509 |
8 | Trust Of Jess Cave | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,992 |
9 | Lawrence C Ludwig | Fair Oaks, CA 95628 | $2,784 |
10 | Big Lake Farms A General Partners | Ross, CA 94957 | $2,320 |
11 | Santa Rosa Tule Duck Club | Williams, CA 95987 | $2,217 |
12 | Oakland Associates Inc | Dublin, CA 94568 | $2,121 |
13 | Lew A Garbutt | Anderson, CA 96007 | $1,870 |
14 | Acre Farms | El Cerrito, CA 94530 | $1,632 |
15 | Hunter Creek Duck Club | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $1,632 |
16 | J G Mensik Et Al | Willows, CA 95988 | $1,507 |
17 | Tank Lake Farms | Princeton, CA 95970 | $1,374 |
18 | Commodore Duck Club | San Mateo, CA 94402 | $1,326 |
19 | Tin Can Louie % Tabor Kopan | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | $1,133 |
20 | Gravel Pit Duck Club | Willits, CA 95490 | $1,061 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>