Dairy Programs in Fresno County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 254
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $43,117,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Medeiros Dairy Inc | Laton, CA 93242 | $450,981 |
22 | David Frea Dairy LLC | Fresno, CA 93704 | $446,564 |
23 | Bernard & Rebecca D Te Velde J V | Hanford, CA 93230 | $408,126 |
24 | J & D Wilson & Sons Dairy Lp | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $407,748 |
25 | Open Sky Ranch Inc | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $406,352 |
26 | Medeiros Holsteins | Laton, CA 93242 | $397,076 |
27 | Mary D Garcia | Laton, CA 93242 | $392,302 |
28 | Maddox Dairy LLC | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $384,654 |
29 | Douglas Maddox | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $371,173 |
30 | Black Diamond Dairy | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $363,027 |
31 | Nash Farms Inc | Selma, CA 93662 | $359,655 |
32 | Bar 20 Partners Ltd | Fresno, CA 93715 | $359,308 |
33 | Joludi Enterprise Inc | Fresno, CA 93706 | $348,296 |
34 | Big De Farms Lp | Fresno, CA 93706 | $347,118 |
35 | Bar None Dairy | Helm, CA 93627 | $346,676 |
36 | Van Der Hoek Dairy | Helm, CA 93627 | $346,309 |
37 | Matthew Gailey & Rachel Gailey Family Revocable Tr | Kerman, CA 93630 | $336,883 |
38 | Thommen Dairy | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $336,773 |
39 | Generations Dairy | Kerman, CA 93630 | $333,368 |
40 | Jose Ribeiro & Son Dairy | Laton, CA 93242 | $331,309 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”