Farm Subsidy information
Fresno County, California
Total Subsidies in Fresno County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 905
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $132,604,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | G3 Farming Trust | Fresno, CA 93711 | $1,860,319 |
2 | Woolf Family Trust No I | Fresno, CA 93711 | $1,448,003 |
3 | Errotabere Ranches | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,044,141 |
4 | Paul Singh | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $1,026,203 |
5 | Swaranjit Singh | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $1,026,203 |
6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $973,471 |
7 | Kochergen Farms Composting Inc | Fresno, CA 93771 | $808,912 |
8 | Susan Abatti Coelho | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $799,556 |
9 | Perez Farms | Crows Landing, CA 95313 | $792,256 |
10 | John Coelho Joe & Jerald Coelho Ptr Terra Linda Fa | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $769,874 |
11 | Vincent J Coelho Daddy's Pride Farming | Hanford, CA 93232 | $741,690 |
12 | Worth Farms | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $711,630 |
13 | Shows Family Farms Lp | Fresno, CA 93730 | $696,934 |
14 | Edward M Coelho | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $695,266 |
15 | Burford Family Fmg L P | Fresno, CA 93711 | $681,554 |
16 | Casaca Vineyards | Five Points, CA 93624 | $657,480 |
17 | , | $653,696 | |
18 | Harris Farms Inc | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $576,526 |
19 | , | $575,578 | |
20 | Df 2000 Trust | Five Points, CA 93624 | $571,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>