Farm Subsidy information
Glenn County, California
Total Subsidies in Glenn County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,894
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glenn County, California totaled $673,883,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Danley Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $3,251,778 |
22 | Jasuma Farms | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $3,223,438 |
23 | Aslam & Tariq Khan Farms | Butte City, CA 95920 | $2,949,353 |
24 | Ratliff And Demmer Farms | Artois, CA 95913 | $2,892,718 |
25 | Knowles Ranch | Durham, CA 95938 | $2,884,365 |
26 | Priority Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $2,877,773 |
27 | Southam Joint Venture | Butte City, CA 95920 | $2,842,844 |
28 | J P Montz & Sons | Willows, CA 95988 | $2,761,948 |
29 | Garner Garner And Stoy | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,679,688 |
30 | Schonauer Sons | Orland, CA 95963 | $2,576,593 |
31 | Snow Goose Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $2,538,997 |
32 | Merrill Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $2,482,485 |
33 | Greenwood Dairy | Baltic, SD 57003 | $2,454,945 |
34 | Kennedy Ranch | Glenn, CA 95943 | $2,424,758 |
35 | Domenighini Bros | Willows, CA 95988 | $2,400,396 |
36 | Cmc Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $2,288,787 |
37 | Lohse Bros | Glenn, CA 95943 | $2,244,195 |
38 | Henry Hansen Farms | Princeton, CA 95970 | $2,223,517 |
39 | Mekgj Partnership | Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | $2,129,033 |
40 | Cp Sheppard Farms | Biggs, CA 95917 | $2,085,877 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”