Farm Subsidy information
Imperial County, California
Total Subsidies in Imperial County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 359
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Imperial County, California totaled $64,893,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Double M Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $1,548,578 |
2 | Spotted And Speckled Cattle Compa | La Quinta, CA 92253 | $1,375,000 |
3 | Benson Farms LLC | Brawley, CA 92227 | $1,150,828 |
4 | Beachline Citrus LLC | Blythe, CA 92225 | $1,131,392 |
5 | Schaffner Dairy Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $1,101,165 |
6 | Bullfrog Farms | Imperial, CA 92251 | $1,031,136 |
7 | Mainas Farms Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $1,009,598 |
8 | Joe Heger Farms LLC | El Centro, CA 92244 | $1,000,000 |
9 | Trinity Produce Sales Inc | El Centro, CA 92243 | $1,000,000 |
10 | El Toro Export LLC | El Centro, CA 92244 | $964,584 |
11 | Coastline Family Farms Inc | Salinas, CA 93905 | $950,000 |
12 | Vail Ranches | Brawley, CA 92227 | $901,430 |
13 | Spruce Farms LLC | Brawley, CA 92227 | $877,433 |
14 | Ecco II | Brawley, CA 92227 | $854,167 |
15 | Brandt Farms Lp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $795,815 |
16 | Smoke Tree Ranches LLC | Brawley, CA 92227 | $761,133 |
17 | Wisteria Farms LLC | El Centro, CA 92243 | $691,264 |
18 | Siri And Son Farms Inc | St Paul, OR 97137 | $683,852 |
19 | Jack Brothers Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $667,533 |
20 | Araguas Livestock LLC | Holtville, CA 92250 | $659,732 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>