Dairy Programs in Kings County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 341
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Kings County, California totaled $61,747,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hakker Dairy L P | Hanford, CA 93230 | $538,730 |
22 | J D Mello Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $536,659 |
23 | Joe Parreira Dairy | Stratford, CA 93266 | $512,716 |
24 | Lakeside Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $505,592 |
25 | Bernard & Rebecca D Te Velde J V | Hanford, CA 93230 | $502,007 |
26 | Carl Sousa White River Dairy | Stratford, CA 93266 | $497,289 |
27 | Silva & Son Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $497,240 |
28 | Anthony & Robert Brazil | Hanford, CA 93230 | $491,487 |
29 | Double L Cattle Co | Visalia, CA 93290 | $479,623 |
30 | Ryan Dias | Reedley, CA 93654 | $479,356 |
31 | Valadao Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $474,727 |
32 | Flavio Almeida Martins Top Line Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $469,090 |
33 | Joe Mendes Dba High Roller Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $461,208 |
34 | Barreto And Silveira | Hanford, CA 93230 | $438,198 |
35 | Droogh Dairy Lp | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $430,012 |
36 | Valley View Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $428,472 |
37 | Rocking Horse Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $426,072 |
38 | Vitor Borba Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $425,621 |
39 | John Cunha Dairy | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $414,258 |
40 | Joaquim & Ana Mattos Rev 2006 Trust Dtd July 14 20 | Hanford, CA 93230 | $410,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”