Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Los Angeles County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $128,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Delmar Van Dam | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $36,785 |
2 | Gertrude Van Dam | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $36,785 |
3 | Norwalk Dairy | Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 | $14,108 |
4 | Jose M Maritorena Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $9,410 |
5 | Nebeker Ranch Inc | Los Angeles, CA 90049 | $7,124 |
6 | John Beery | Palmdale, CA 93551 | $4,385 |
7 | Justin G. Lane | Lancaster, CA 93534 | $3,994 |
8 | Terry A Munz Farming | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $3,499 |
9 | Cal Poly Pomona Foundation Inc | Pomona, CA 91768 | $2,768 |
10 | Eugene O'brien | Rowland Heights, CA 91748 | $2,340 |
11 | Chase Classic Angus | Torrance, CA 90505 | $1,964 |
12 | James Slayton | Palmdale, CA 93551 | $1,134 |
13 | Frank Lane Ranch | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $995 |
14 | Esfandiar Kadivar | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $878 |
15 | Reitano Family Revocable Trust | Leona Valley, CA 93551 | $801 |
16 | Patricia Plumlee | Gorman, CA 93243 | $549 |
17 | Sky Meadow Farms | Beverly Hills, CA 90212 | $504 |
18 | Arroyo Tire Co | Castaic, CA 91384 | $293 |
19 | Norma Saylor | Santa Clarita, CA 91350 | $171 |
20 | High Desert Dairy | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $0 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>