Total Commodity Programs in Los Angeles County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 53
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $2,744,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Filemon G Lopez | Bellflower, CA 90706 | $29,106 |
22 | Urban Homestead | Pasadena, CA 91103 | $24,671 |
23 | Enterprising Bee Co., LLC | Chatsworth, CA 91311 | $22,332 |
24 | John Aiello | San Pedro, CA 90732 | $21,133 |
25 | Edward Robert Feinstein | Leona Valley, CA 93551 | $19,117 |
26 | Antwan Farag | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $14,198 |
27 | Fish Friend Sea LLC | Long Beach, CA 90808 | $12,894 |
28 | Topanga Garden Center LLC | Chatsworth, CA 91311 | $12,587 |
29 | B & D Cattle Co | Tehachapi, CA 93561 | $11,061 |
30 | Pacific Bounty Fish Company, LLC | Redondo Beach, CA 90278 | $10,437 |
31 | Integrity Fish Inc | San Pedro, CA 90731 | $10,320 |
32 | Westerns Oceans Inc | Santa Clarita, CA 91387 | $9,704 |
33 | Pacific Fishery Inc | Los Angeles, CA 90046 | $9,308 |
34 | George Paul Marler Jr | Lawndale, CA 90260 | $6,732 |
35 | Buzzed Honeys, Inc | Altadena, CA 91001 | $4,164 |
36 | John Crowe | Redondo Beach, CA 90278 | $3,979 |
37 | Giambattista Tino Perone | San Pedro, CA 90732 | $3,860 |
38 | Jjj Bees | Reseda, CA 91335 | $3,426 |
39 | Michael B Williams | Acton, CA 93510 | $3,104 |
40 | Rafael Izarraraz | Pomona, CA 91766 | $2,723 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”