Dairy Programs in Marin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 64
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Marin County, California totaled $8,377,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Silveira Ranches | San Rafael, CA 94915 | $151,828 |
22 | Moreda Valley Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $138,272 |
23 | James Mcisaac | Novato, CA 94947 | $135,574 |
24 | R & J Mcclelland Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $126,509 |
25 | Ielmorini Dairy Valley Ford | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $120,152 |
26 | Blakes Landing Farms Inc | Marshall, CA 94940 | $116,375 |
27 | Mccall Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $108,296 |
28 | Leveroni Brothers | Novato, CA 94948 | $106,281 |
29 | Blakes Landing Farms | Marshall, CA 94940 | $105,841 |
30 | Waldo Giacomini & Sons Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $102,209 |
31 | W & S Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $99,437 |
32 | Don Moreda Jr | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $80,504 |
33 | Victor Chiapetta | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $80,264 |
34 | William Nunes | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $78,362 |
35 | Leveroni Bros | Novato, CA 94947 | $66,283 |
36 | Stage Gulch Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $65,715 |
37 | Dolcini Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $57,485 |
38 | Jj's Family Dairy Corp | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $47,514 |
39 | George N Duncan | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $46,600 |
40 | L Silva Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $40,141 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”