Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Marin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 144
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Marin County, California totaled $2,806,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard L Gallagher | Nicasico, CA 94946 | $39,094 |
22 | Cypress Lane Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $38,857 |
23 | R % J Mcclelland Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $38,270 |
24 | Richard Grossi | Inverness, CA 94937 | $37,333 |
25 | James Spaletta Sr | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $34,293 |
26 | Spaletta Dairy | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $31,886 |
27 | Loren Poncia | Tomales, CA 94971 | $30,218 |
28 | William Zimmerman | Marshall, CA 94940 | $29,606 |
29 | Martin Pozzi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $26,227 |
30 | Eugene C Poncia | Tomales, CA 94971 | $25,690 |
31 | Doug Ielmorini Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $25,684 |
32 | Lafranchi Ranch | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $24,933 |
33 | Rancho Tocaloma-donald J Mcisaac & Ted Mcisaac Ptr | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $24,077 |
34 | Kehoe Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $22,984 |
35 | Conlan Ranches California | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $22,575 |
36 | Mccall Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $21,441 |
37 | Bell Cattle Company | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $21,353 |
38 | Francis Chris Cornett | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $20,951 |
39 | L Corda & Sons | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $20,534 |
40 | L Ranch Co | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $20,006 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”