Farm Subsidy information
Marin County, California
Total Subsidies in Marin County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 110
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marin County, California totaled $3,824,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gourmet Mushrooms, Inc. | Sebastopol, CA 95473 | $250,000 |
| 2 | Neil Mcisaac & Son Inc | Tomales, CA 94971 | $215,317 |
| 3 | Cypress Lane Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $185,413 |
| 4 | Spaletta Dairy | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $172,479 |
| 5 | Lafranchi Ranch | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $135,852 |
| 6 | Mcclure Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $131,253 |
| 7 | Mcdonald Ranches | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $126,629 |
| 8 | Moretti Family Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $125,257 |
| 9 | L Corda & Sons | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $116,923 |
| 10 | Mccall Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $115,759 |
| 11 | R & J Mcclelland Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $109,499 |
| 12 | Double M Dairy LLC | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $107,162 |
| 13 | Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $94,662 |
| 14 | Doug Ielmorini Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $86,116 |
| 15 | Spaletta Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $78,382 |
| 16 | North Coast Vineyard Management Inc | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $69,509 |
| 17 | Mcdonald Lucchesi Cattle | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $68,447 |
| 18 | Loren Poncia | Novato, CA 94949 | $68,133 |
| 19 | Spaletta Beef Ranch | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $64,903 |
| 20 | Christopher W Lawson | Dillon Beach, CA 94929 | $59,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf