Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 147
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Merced County, California totaled $6,730,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fagundes Fagundes Fagundes | Merced, CA 95348 | $454,278 |
2 | Romero Cattle Co LLC | San Jose, CA 95109 | $397,235 |
3 | Duane Martin Livestock | Ione, CA 95640 | $328,622 |
4 | Roy & Dana Richards | Merced, CA 95340 | $286,563 |
5 | Jackson Land & Cattle Lp | Livermore, CA 94551 | $282,836 |
6 | Kent M Hirdes | Turlock, CA 95380 | $260,285 |
7 | Chance Land & Cattle | Ballico, CA 95303 | $255,970 |
8 | Robert Erickson | Merced, CA 95341 | $227,138 |
9 | George Labar | Modesto, CA 95355 | $200,671 |
10 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $178,847 |
11 | Jean M Arburua Survivor's Trust | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $170,681 |
12 | Amador Zabalbeascoa | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $164,103 |
13 | Billy Grissom Fertilizer Spreadin | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $135,836 |
14 | Juan Amparan | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $130,526 |
15 | Fagundes Brothers Dairy 2 | Merced, CA 95344 | $128,986 |
16 | Erik O Roen Family Trust U/a/d August 27, 2004 | Knights Ferry, CA 95361 | $116,314 |
17 | Double Y Ranches | Fresno, CA 93711 | $98,527 |
18 | John M Arburua | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $97,813 |
19 | Kyla Michelle Prunty Rianda | Gustine, CA 95322 | $97,773 |
20 | M And J French Ranch LLC | Hollister, CA 95024 | $95,912 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>