Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Merced County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 147

Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Merced County, California totaled $6,730,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Non-insured Disaster Assistance
1995-2023
1Fagundes Fagundes FagundesMerced, CA 95348$454,278
2Romero Cattle Co LLCSan Jose, CA 95109$397,235
3Duane Martin LivestockIone, CA 95640$328,622
4Roy & Dana RichardsMerced, CA 95340$286,563
5Jackson Land & Cattle LpLivermore, CA 94551$282,836
6Kent M HirdesTurlock, CA 95380$260,285
7Chance Land & CattleBallico, CA 95303$255,970
8Robert EricksonMerced, CA 95341$227,138
9George LabarModesto, CA 95355$200,671
10Ferrara Ranches Ltd JvSan Jose, CA 95109$178,847
11Jean M Arburua Survivor's TrustLos Banos, CA 93635$170,681
12Amador ZabalbeascoaLos Banos, CA 93635$164,103
13Billy Grissom Fertilizer SpreadinHilmar, CA 95324$135,836
14Juan AmparanLos Banos, CA 93635$130,526
15Fagundes Brothers Dairy 2Merced, CA 95344$128,986
16Erik O Roen Family Trust U/a/d August 27, 2004Knights Ferry, CA 95361$116,314
17Double Y RanchesFresno, CA 93711$98,527
18John M ArburuaLos Banos, CA 93635$97,813
19Kyla Michelle Prunty RiandaGustine, CA 95322$97,773
20M And J French Ranch LLCHollister, CA 95024$95,912

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag