Market Gains in Merced County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 159
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Merced County, California totaled $5,789,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Stanley Cotta Jr Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $51,295 |
| 42 | Nickel Family LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93386 | $48,461 |
| 43 | J P M Ag | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $47,196 |
| 44 | Montague Pig Farm Gp | El Nido, CA 95317 | $47,027 |
| 45 | Redfern Ranches Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $43,061 |
| 46 | Rebecca Ferreira | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $40,819 |
| 47 | John Ferreira | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $40,819 |
| 48 | David Carlucci Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $38,122 |
| 49 | Bob & Jim Bertao | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $37,656 |
| 50 | Jim Vincent Farming, Inc. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $36,617 |
| 51 | Menefee & Sons II | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $33,425 |
| 52 | Pentagon Company | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $31,210 |
| 53 | Fred Oliveira | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $29,196 |
| 54 | Palazzo Farming Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $25,926 |
| 55 | Jan Painter | Atwater, CA 95301 | $25,511 |
| 56 | Philip Painter | Atwater, CA 95301 | $25,511 |
| 57 | John R Coelho | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $25,353 |
| 58 | Dominic Giannone Unified Credit T | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $25,188 |
| 59 | Louis Tarasco | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $23,331 |
| 60 | Fagundes Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $22,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf