Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program in Riverside County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 42
Recipients of Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $2,065,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | The Cox Family Trust Dtd 100508 | Blythe, CA 92225 | $22,715 |
22 | Ford Underwood & Sons | Perris, CA 92572 | $18,450 |
23 | Nish Noroian Farms | Blythe, CA 92226 | $16,449 |
24 | Carl J Rheingans | Winchester, CA 92596 | $15,706 |
25 | Hull Farms Inc | Blythe, CA 92225 | $15,015 |
26 | Triple Will Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $15,006 |
27 | Joseph S Holt | Blythe, CA 92225 | $14,579 |
28 | Phil Baker | Blythe, CA 92225 | $12,370 |
29 | Orson Holt | Blythe, CA 92225 | $12,310 |
30 | Peggy Louise Martin | Blythe, CA 92225 | $11,823 |
31 | The Arrow Company | Blythe, CA 92225 | $11,165 |
32 | Lloyd Lazenby | Blythe, CA 92225 | $8,814 |
33 | Jimenez Farms | Florence, AZ 85232 | $8,068 |
34 | Triple B Farms Inc | Hemet, CA 92545 | $6,262 |
35 | Mark Reay | Blythe, CA 92225 | $5,528 |
36 | Ron Dawson | Blythe, CA 92225 | $3,496 |
37 | Alan Bebout | Blythe, CA 92226 | $2,710 |
38 | Schindler Bros Inc | Blythe, CA 92225 | $2,536 |
39 | W Deion Stroschein | Blythe, CA 92225 | $2,185 |
40 | Craig A Smith | Nuevo, CA 92567 | $1,659 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”