Total Commodity Programs in Riverside County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 161
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $13,742,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Peninsula Farms LLC | Newport Beach, CA 92660 | $197,982 |
22 | Chaffin Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $182,988 |
23 | Greenbelt Nursery Inc | Riverside, CA 92513 | $173,250 |
24 | Jack Seiler Farms Gp | Palo Verde, CA 92266 | $170,688 |
25 | Domenigoni Bros Ranch Lp | Winchester, CA 92596 | $170,073 |
26 | Scott Bros Dairy Farms Lp | Moreno Valley, CA 92555 | $158,923 |
27 | Jong's Poultry Farm | Riverside, CA 92503 | $147,846 |
28 | Joseph Deconinck | Blythe, CA 92225 | $137,699 |
29 | Punjab Farms Inc | Los Angeles, CA 90021 | $133,650 |
30 | Dyt Dairy | Lakeview, CA 92567 | $130,983 |
31 | Riverbed Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92583 | $127,173 |
32 | Dick Van Dam Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $127,173 |
33 | Oostdam Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $127,173 |
34 | Jim Bootsma Jr Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92581 | $125,275 |
35 | Hollandia Farms North | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $120,508 |
36 | Rogelio Vargas | Coachella, CA 92236 | $110,139 |
37 | Coxco LLC | Blythe, CA 92225 | $106,885 |
38 | William Koot Dairy | Winchester, CA 92596 | $105,180 |
39 | Ranch 440 | Mecca, CA 92254 | $103,602 |
40 | Elliott & Hull | Blythe, CA 92225 | $98,212 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”