Total Commodity Programs in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,300
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $154,369,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Van Steyn Dairy | Galt, CA 95632 | $3,055,031 |
| 2 | Van Warmerdam Dairy Inc | Galt, CA 95632 | $2,613,758 |
| 3 | B & J Dairy Lp | Galt, CA 95632 | $2,494,269 |
| 4 | Klm Ranches Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $1,761,920 |
| 5 | Natomas Growers | Sacramento, CA 95831 | $1,734,750 |
| 6 | Gary Silva Sr | Herald, CA 95638 | $1,730,973 |
| 7 | Wackman Ranch | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $1,658,801 |
| 8 | Mello Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $1,637,349 |
| 9 | Lowrey Cattle And Farming | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $1,550,550 |
| 10 | Mcenerney & Sons | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,540,378 |
| 11 | Amistad Ranches | Courtland, CA 95615 | $1,488,939 |
| 12 | New Hope Dairy LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,449,940 |
| 13 | Joe M Simoes & Sons Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $1,441,738 |
| 14 | Tony Mello | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,379,977 |
| 15 | Cal-denier Dairy LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,343,071 |
| 16 | Johnson Farms | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,222,404 |
| 17 | Chavier Farming | Isleton, CA 95641 | $1,200,576 |
| 18 | The Fishery | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,169,415 |
| 19 | Sodbuster Farms | Herald, CA 95638 | $1,139,626 |
| 20 | Joe Sanchez Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $1,117,737 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
