Total Commodity Programs in San Bernardino County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 72
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Bernardino County, California totaled $5,422,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tiva Dairy | Chino, CA 91710 | $89,021 |
22 | Souza Dairies | Chino, CA 91708 | $86,244 |
23 | V & B Nursery, Inc. | Ontario, CA 91761 | $80,370 |
24 | Struikmans & Son | Ontario, CA 91762 | $78,357 |
25 | Bachoc Dairy | Ontario, CA 91761 | $77,157 |
26 | Green Valley Food Products Inc | Barstow, CA 92311 | $64,588 |
27 | Euclid Stockyards Inc. | Ontario, CA 91762 | $59,864 |
28 | Labrucherie Brothers, LLC | Ontario, CA 91761 | $51,778 |
29 | Cog, LLC | West Covina, CA 91792 | $39,024 |
30 | Highcrown Retail Management, Inc Dba Modo Farm Sal | Helendale, CA 92342 | $35,627 |
31 | David Thornton | Alta Loma, CA 91737 | $27,280 |
32 | Pauline M Thornton | Alta Loma, CA 91737 | $26,825 |
33 | Midland Enterprise LLC | Barstow, CA 92311 | $24,810 |
34 | J.t. Cattle Co. | Ontario, CA 91762 | $24,416 |
35 | Harter Farms LLC | Needles, CA 92363 | $22,199 |
36 | Valley Livestock Inc | Ontario, CA 91762 | $19,635 |
37 | Wuri Packing, Inc | Lucerne Valley, CA 92356 | $14,745 |
38 | Standing Bar G Productions Inc | Apple Valley, CA 92308 | $14,091 |
39 | Blake Archibek | Newberry Springs, CA 92365 | $13,717 |
40 | B & E Dairy | Barstow, CA 92311 | $13,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”