Dairy Programs in San Joaquin County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 50
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $7,471,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Temple Creek Dairy Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $127,173 |
22 | Manuel Teixeira | Modesto, CA 95358 | $127,173 |
23 | Relm Properties LLC | Ripon, CA 95366 | $127,173 |
24 | Thomas J Koolhaas | Farmington, CA 95230 | $127,173 |
25 | Wagner Dairy Gp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $127,173 |
26 | Lima Ranch | Lodi, CA 95242 | $127,173 |
27 | Woods Dairy | Lodi, CA 95242 | $123,860 |
28 | Ed Nunes Dairy Lp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $120,508 |
29 | Dutra Farms Inc | Manteca, CA 95337 | $120,508 |
30 | Nascimento Dairy | Turlock, CA 95382 | $120,508 |
31 | Triple J Dairy | Acampo, CA 95220 | $120,508 |
32 | Bartelink Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $120,508 |
33 | John C Borges | Tracy, CA 95304 | $120,508 |
34 | Gerrit Hofman | Manteca, CA 95337 | $120,508 |
35 | Frank Borges | Modesto, CA 95356 | $120,508 |
36 | Michael R Kooyman | Acampo, CA 95220 | $120,508 |
37 | Frank N Rocha Dairy L P | Escalon, CA 95320 | $120,508 |
38 | A & M Pires Trust 2011 Maira F Pires | Acampo, CA 95220 | $120,508 |
39 | Luis F Fragoso | Escalon, CA 95320 | $120,508 |
40 | Manuel Silva | Stockton, CA 95215 | $120,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”