Direct Payment Program in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 902
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $32,274,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wagner Dairy Gp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $254,503 |
22 | Arnaudo Bros | Tracy, CA 95376 | $253,505 |
23 | Luis Dairy Lp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $251,102 |
24 | Delta Wetlands Properties | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | $240,000 |
25 | Green Farms | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $235,926 |
26 | William Sorrenti | Escalon, CA 95320 | $233,249 |
27 | Rita Sorrenti | Escalon, CA 95320 | $233,249 |
28 | G Biagi Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95219 | $232,024 |
29 | Ferguson Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95207 | $224,720 |
30 | Faria Dairy Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $201,185 |
31 | Tuscany Research Institute | Las Vegas, NV 89119 | $201,096 |
32 | Herman Doornenbal Jr | Escalon, CA 95320 | $195,696 |
33 | Frank N Rocha Dairy L P | Escalon, CA 95320 | $192,906 |
34 | E & E Company | Stockton, CA 95204 | $192,872 |
35 | Venice Island Inc | Lodi, CA 95242 | $192,635 |
36 | R P Kromann Jr | Escalon, CA 95320 | $190,775 |
37 | Rodney E Dement | Stockton, CA 95219 | $189,090 |
38 | Kenneth Koolhaas | Ripon, CA 95366 | $183,549 |
39 | John Rocha Dba John Rocha Farms | Stockton, CA 95209 | $177,758 |
40 | Manuel Da Silva | Escalon, CA 95320 | $173,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”