Total Commodity Programs in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,259
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $364,321,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vander Schaaf Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $4,125,864 |
2 | Machado Dairy Farms | Manteca, CA 95337 | $3,946,853 |
3 | Jack Klein Trust Ptrshp | Stockton, CA 95267 | $3,742,119 |
4 | Wagner Dairy Gp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $3,396,109 |
5 | Dutra Farms Inc | Manteca, CA 95337 | $2,925,010 |
6 | G & H Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,537,944 |
7 | Frank N Rocha Dairy L P | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,533,810 |
8 | Van Exel Dairy | Lodi, CA 95242 | $2,516,316 |
9 | Silva Bros Dairy | Acampo, CA 95220 | $2,419,260 |
10 | Ed Nunes Dairy Lp | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,105,337 |
11 | Fred A Douma Dairy Partnership | Tracy, CA 95304 | $2,104,634 |
12 | Raymond & Susanne Quaresma Dairy | Manteca, CA 95337 | $2,063,708 |
13 | Delta Wetlands Properties | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | $2,052,565 |
14 | Del Rio Partners | Lodi, CA 95242 | $1,911,049 |
15 | Lima Ranch | Lodi, CA 95242 | $1,898,790 |
16 | Manuel & Jeannette Borges Dairy Inc | Stockton, CA 95215 | $1,737,284 |
17 | Bwc Weststeyn Dairy Lp | Linden, CA 95236 | $1,714,122 |
18 | Prins Dairy Lp | Stockton, CA 95215 | $1,705,223 |
19 | Seifert Dairy II Lp | Acampo, CA 95220 | $1,703,735 |
20 | Faria Dairy Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $1,701,089 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>