Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 501

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $18,670,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Koch Mesa Nursery, Inc. Dba EufloNipomo, CA 93444$245,747
22Rick MachadoShandon, CA 93461$236,885
23Cal Coast OrchidsLos Osos, CA 93402$235,823
24Cagliero Vineyards IncPaso Robles, CA 93446$233,969
25Tagawa Plant CompanyBrighton, CO 80601$206,525
26Lilian L MasseySan Miguel, CA 93451$194,873
27Pacific Sun Growers Greenhouses,Nipomo, CA 93444$178,303
28Jeanette Holder-bartlesonArroyo Grande, CA 93420$177,518
29Armando GonzalezNipomo, CA 93444$177,375
30Massey Bourdet LivestockSan Miguel, CA 93451$176,220
31Benchmark Vineyard Management IncPaso Robles, CA 93447$164,232
32Michael MasseySan Miguel, CA 93451$149,900
33The Ernest Righetti CorpSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401$119,493
34White Ranch CompanyShandon, CA 93461$118,901
35Four Sisters Ranch LLCPaso Robles, CA 93446$113,991
36Massey Davis LivestockTempleton, CA 93465$112,090
37Forest Nurseries IncLos Osos, CA 93402$105,614
38Morro Ranch Company LLCTempleton, CA 93465$103,293
39Rmt Enterprises LLC And Chad Wittstrom Third LoopPaso Robles, CA 93446$103,016
40Vintage First LLCPaso Robles, CA 93446$101,448

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag