Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 104
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $333,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cagliero Vineyards Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $30,518 |
2 | , | $26,606 | |
3 | Lilian L Massey | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $25,418 |
4 | Benchmark Vineyard Management Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $21,422 |
5 | Vintage First LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $13,232 |
6 | Rj Livestock LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $12,788 |
7 | Boneso Vineyards LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $11,692 |
8 | Jd Farming Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $11,597 |
9 | Brave Oak Vineyard LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $11,416 |
10 | J B Jaureguy | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $8,690 |
11 | Martha L Nevarez | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $8,578 |
12 | Daniel Jaureguy | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $8,432 |
13 | Old Creek Ranch Inc | Cayucos, CA 93430 | $8,379 |
14 | Neal Springs Vineyards Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $7,765 |
15 | Boneso Family Vineyard Lp | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $7,755 |
16 | Javier Martinon | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $7,135 |
17 | Justin Rhoades | Cambria, CA 93428 | $6,452 |
18 | Cathie Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $6,188 |
19 | Jaureguy Family Trust No. 1 | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $5,995 |
20 | Santiago M Santillan | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $5,193 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>