Conservation Reserve Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 446
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $61,387,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,245,915 |
2 | White Ranch Company | Shandon, CA 93461 | $2,155,760 |
3 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,846,826 |
4 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $1,750,262 |
5 | K W Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $1,571,518 |
6 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $1,287,481 |
7 | Ronald Hodel | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,152,847 |
8 | Diane Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $981,337 |
9 | Charles W. Kuhnle And Sons | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $980,865 |
10 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $889,777 |
11 | Joseph D Kuhnle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $821,852 |
12 | Carrie A Peck Trust | Fresno, CA 93720 | $819,151 |
13 | Kuhnle Properties Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $806,448 |
14 | Michael Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $775,346 |
15 | Janet Klock | Tempe, AZ 85283 | $751,908 |
16 | Sill Properties Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93301 | $693,525 |
17 | Miller & King | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $691,304 |
18 | Lonnie Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $680,391 |
19 | Kenneth Eng Jr | San Antonio, TX 78229 | $669,914 |
20 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $615,820 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>