SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Santa Barbara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Santa Barbara County, California totaled $2,842,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R C Farms | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $58,079 |
22 | Rancho Rita Vista LLC | Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 | $50,369 |
23 | Luis F Pantoja | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $50,077 |
24 | Abel Perez | Grover Beach, CA 93483 | $49,358 |
25 | Jerry Signorelli | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $46,478 |
26 | Juan Ruiz | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $29,441 |
27 | Sostenes Bautista | Santa Maria, CA 93454 | $29,357 |
28 | S & S Ranch LLC | Paramount, CA 90723 | $28,698 |
29 | Alvaro Sanchez Cortez | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $22,196 |
30 | Ceferino Cheng | Torrance, CA 90503 | $22,083 |
31 | Billy L Harrington | Maricopa, CA 93252 | $19,715 |
32 | Paulino J Vasquez | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $17,180 |
33 | Triple H Farms | Maricopa, CA 93252 | $15,509 |
34 | Bryan G Mitchell | Reno, NV 89511 | $15,053 |
35 | Francisca Lopez | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $12,265 |
36 | Three Creek Vineyard | Santa Ynez, CA 93460 | $12,264 |
37 | Jesus Barrueta | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $11,642 |
38 | Ronald L Kemp | Santa Barbara, CA 93105 | $9,861 |
39 | Rancheros Valencia Inc | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $9,855 |
40 | Irma Suarez | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $8,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”