Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $1,167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | High Rise Farms | Portland, OR 97210 | $9,164 |
22 | Cortese Bros | San Jose, CA 95127 | $7,336 |
23 | Peter Giordano | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $7,317 |
24 | Dolores J Mariani | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $7,317 |
25 | Yutaka Fujita | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $6,929 |
26 | Moitozo Bros Inc | San Jose, CA 95134 | $5,697 |
27 | C J Olson | Sunnyvale, CA 94087 | $5,276 |
28 | Guadalupe Spindola | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $4,393 |
29 | Ngan Au | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $4,211 |
30 | Scaglione Orchards | Hollister, CA 95023 | $3,742 |
31 | Peter Van Dyke | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $2,871 |
32 | Yvonne E Jacobson | Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 | $2,681 |
33 | Emilio A Orsetti | Gilroy, CA 95021 | $2,415 |
34 | Betty Van Dyke | Santa Cruz, CA 95062 | $2,332 |
35 | Eric Van Dyke | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $2,332 |
36 | Kurt Van Dyke | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $2,332 |
37 | Van Dyke Ranch | Santa Cruz, CA 95062 | $1,680 |
38 | Surendra Mody | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $1,676 |
39 | Ines White Dba San Martin Growers | San Martin, CA 95046 | $1,239 |
40 | Andrew Mariani | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”