Total Commodity Programs in Santa Clara County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 68
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $2,886,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Olivera Egg Ranch LLC | San Jose, CA 95132 | $13,119 |
22 | Andrew Mariani | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $12,478 |
23 | Twenty Four Seven Livestock LLC | Hollister, CA 95024 | $12,007 |
24 | Christopher Borello | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $11,846 |
25 | Borugi LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $11,653 |
26 | Borello Farms Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95038 | $11,362 |
27 | Justin Fields | Coyote, CA 95013 | $10,995 |
28 | Jonathan Nunez Esquivel | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $10,938 |
29 | Mariani Orchards Inc | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $9,918 |
30 | Fernando Rocha | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $9,873 |
31 | Leland P Belli | San Jose, CA 95127 | $9,481 |
32 | Robert Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $9,278 |
33 | James Prewett | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $9,141 |
34 | Wen P Cheng | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $8,765 |
35 | Xanadu Orchards LLC | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $8,567 |
36 | Fellom Ranch Vineyards | Cupertino, CA 95014 | $8,264 |
37 | Israel Martinez Perez | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $6,644 |
38 | Jim Aira | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $6,461 |
39 | Joseph Daniel Torres | San Jose, CA 95152 | $5,788 |
40 | Marxmiller Fishing, LLC | Cupertino, CA 95014 | $4,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”