Total Commodity Programs in Solano County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,422
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Solano County, California totaled $91,598,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | E & H Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $3,095,312 |
2 | R Emigh Livestock | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $2,326,128 |
3 | Islands Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $1,780,913 |
4 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $1,662,730 |
5 | Detar Livestock Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,649,209 |
6 | Knob Hill Mines Inc | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $1,549,386 |
7 | Nakahara Farms Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $1,535,348 |
8 | Edward A & Ian Anderson | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $1,444,015 |
9 | Gene Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,379,413 |
10 | Elizabeth R Robben | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,378,049 |
11 | Reveille Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,201,984 |
12 | Ian & Margaret Anderson Dba E A Anderson & Son | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $1,201,782 |
13 | B & J Farms | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,161,731 |
14 | Schene Enterprises Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,146,889 |
15 | Hd Ranch | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,135,473 |
16 | Page Baldwin Farms | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $1,076,463 |
17 | D & R Livestock | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,066,222 |
18 | Mortimore L Triplett | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,005,914 |
19 | S & S Farming Co | Dixon, CA 95620 | $975,608 |
20 | Atkinson Farms II Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $964,762 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>