Total Commodity Programs in Sonoma County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 273
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sonoma County, California totaled $11,652,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Sanchietti Farming Inc | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $118,233 |
| 22 | E & M Deniz Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $118,058 |
| 23 | Pride Mountain Vineyards LLC | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $116,578 |
| 24 | Aggio Dairy Inc | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $114,785 |
| 25 | Terrilinda Farms | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $114,607 |
| 26 | Ronald E Wilson Dba Diamond W Dairy Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $113,906 |
| 27 | Albert Mello Jr | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $113,668 |
| 28 | Moreda Valley Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $113,230 |
| 29 | Paul Bianchi Inc | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $112,621 |
| 30 | Joe Pinheiro | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $112,420 |
| 31 | Gerald Spaletta Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $112,353 |
| 32 | Correia Dairy | Cotati, CA 94931 | $112,230 |
| 33 | Mce Amos Inc | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $112,021 |
| 34 | George Bianchi Inc | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $111,999 |
| 35 | Debernardi Dairy Inc | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $111,903 |
| 36 | Mazzetta Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $111,903 |
| 37 | George Mcclelland | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $111,903 |
| 38 | Circle Lc Corp | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $111,903 |
| 39 | Michael E Meyer | Sebastopol, CA 95472 | $110,104 |
| 40 | Nosecchi Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $109,444 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
