Total Commodity Programs in Sutter County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 467
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $6,425,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Akin Ranch | Robbins, CA 95676 | $31,033 |
42 | Virginia D Van Dyke Family Trust | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $30,227 |
43 | Joe's Girls | Woodland, CA 95695 | $29,892 |
44 | Vertrees Rev '13 Trust | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $28,939 |
45 | Joe And Cleo Schreiner Farming | Woodland, CA 95695 | $28,906 |
46 | Laetsch Living Tr | Kensington, CA 94707 | $28,884 |
47 | Paulsen White Oak L P | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $28,245 |
48 | Hoppin Family Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $27,853 |
49 | Oak Acre Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $27,556 |
50 | Pelger Road 1700 LLC | Manteca, CA 95336 | $26,106 |
51 | Steve Zumalt | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $25,623 |
52 | Nicoli Nicholas Sr | Sacramento, CA 95819 | $25,361 |
53 | Ajab Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $24,616 |
54 | Leo Michel And Sons | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $24,572 |
55 | Dennis Michel Farms Inc | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $24,125 |
56 | El Rio Farms | Trowbridge, CA 95659 | $23,935 |
57 | Evans Farming LLC | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $23,678 |
58 | Brad Howald | Woodland, CA 95695 | $23,077 |
59 | Michele Horsky | Woodland, CA 95695 | $23,077 |
60 | J&m Farms | Sandpoint, ID 83864 | $21,951 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”