Direct Payment Program in Sutter County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,307
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $164,189,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mdm Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $724,707 |
42 | Double D Farms | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $722,591 |
43 | Miller-singh Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $716,764 |
44 | Diamond J Farms | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $709,468 |
45 | John & Catherine Klein | Woodland, CA 95695 | $701,050 |
46 | Triple C Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $700,319 |
47 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $696,155 |
48 | James & Maxi Rogers | Colusa, CA 95932 | $687,896 |
49 | Robert & Martha Devalentine Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $665,046 |
50 | M & J Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $664,008 |
51 | Five Way Farming | Sutter, CA 95982 | $658,832 |
52 | Davis-emery Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $590,133 |
53 | R & B Thiel | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $589,578 |
54 | Kw Farming | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $585,418 |
55 | Lance & Audrey Tennis | Chico, CA 95926 | $585,113 |
56 | Stephen & Debra Tarke Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $584,905 |
57 | Schreiner Brothers | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $570,514 |
58 | Marcuse Colony Farms | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $568,420 |
59 | Trevethan Farms | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $566,536 |
60 | Rimlander Farms | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $547,048 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”