Total Commodity Programs in Sutter County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,567
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sutter County, California totaled $553,909,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arnold Hoffart Mark Hoffart & Nei | Robbins, CA 95676 | $7,412,179 |
2 | Sjv Enterprises | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $6,889,400 |
3 | Eastman Ranch | Woodland, CA 95776 | $6,059,370 |
4 | Van Dyke Brothers | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $5,234,793 |
5 | Enterprise Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $4,557,674 |
6 | Murphy Lake Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $4,538,404 |
7 | Circle C | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $4,420,645 |
8 | Akin Ranch | Robbins, CA 95676 | $4,089,153 |
9 | Van Ruiten Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $3,996,449 |
10 | Schreiner Brothers | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $3,597,157 |
11 | Gmg Farms | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $3,541,118 |
12 | James & Claireen Tarke | Sutter, CA 95982 | $3,222,715 |
13 | B E Giovannetti & Sons | Woodland, CA 95695 | $3,152,988 |
14 | Blixen And Glaeser Farms | Davis, CA 95610 | $3,126,816 |
15 | Penning Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $3,115,703 |
16 | Reason Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $3,061,734 |
17 | Shannon Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $3,021,447 |
18 | Nuevo Farms | Sacramento, CA 95841 | $3,016,799 |
19 | Matteoli Bros | Robbins, CA 95676 | $2,879,706 |
20 | Miller-singh Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $2,857,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>