Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Tehama County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 44
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $1,012,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $112,096 |
2 | Lazy Spade LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $106,221 |
3 | Kenneth & Sheree Owens Family 1996 Revocable Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $91,326 |
4 | Bidwell Ranches Inc | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $76,317 |
5 | Richard P O'sullivan | Paynes Creek, CA 96075 | $62,653 |
6 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $57,051 |
7 | Kramer Ranch LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $46,993 |
8 | Sugargrass LLC | Dairy, OR 97625 | $39,829 |
9 | Candace Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $31,684 |
10 | Turri Family Farms | Flournoy, CA 96029 | $31,113 |
11 | James Alford | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $30,146 |
12 | Lpdb LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $29,219 |
13 | John B Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $29,200 |
14 | Tyler Martinez | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $28,999 |
15 | Atkinson Angus Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $28,613 |
16 | Susan Knox | Vina, CA 96092 | $21,964 |
17 | Roney Land & Cattle Co | Chico, CA 95973 | $18,104 |
18 | Douglas C White | Corning, CA 96021 | $17,746 |
19 | Bert Owens - 2015 Owens Family Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $16,490 |
20 | Amber E Wolverton | Vina, CA 96092 | $12,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>