Farm Subsidy information
Tehama County, California
Total Subsidies in Tehama County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 243
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $7,969,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J T Farms | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $238,585 |
| 2 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $155,476 |
| 3 | Zuppan Dairy Partnership | Orland, CA 95963 | $127,599 |
| 4 | Marenco Cattle Company Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $126,959 |
| 5 | Johnny Vogt Sr | Orland, CA 95963 | $126,176 |
| 6 | Bernard Fishman Dba Corning Orchards | Long Beach, CA 90815 | $116,030 |
| 7 | Holiday Ranches Inc | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $107,892 |
| 8 | Christopher Dulaney | Dothan, AL 36301 | $100,964 |
| 9 | Sugargrass LLC | Dairy, OR 97625 | $87,693 |
| 10 | Candace Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $84,607 |
| 11 | Pamela R Bignami | Orland, CA 95963 | $81,093 |
| 12 | Robert D Fumasi Family Trust-robert Fumasi | Orland, CA 95963 | $74,741 |
| 13 | Robert Staley | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $72,312 |
| 14 | Gregory W Long | Corning, CA 96021 | $72,127 |
| 15 | Broken Ridge LLC | San Ramon, CA 94582 | $65,804 |
| 16 | A P Esteve Farms Lp | Lodi, CA 95242 | $65,202 |
| 17 | Thomas Nielsen | Gazelle, CA 96034 | $64,715 |
| 18 | Matt Norene | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $63,581 |
| 19 | Doyle Ranch Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $61,202 |
| 20 | Eduardo Curiel | Corning, CA 96021 | $61,198 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf