Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Tehama County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 129
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Tehama County, California totaled $1,194,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arrowsmith & Sons Apiaries Inc. | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $289,397 |
2 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $37,742 |
3 | Robert Staley | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $35,745 |
4 | Dusty Debraga | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $34,930 |
5 | Lazy Spade LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $31,250 |
6 | Richard P O'sullivan | Paynes Creek, CA 96075 | $30,877 |
7 | Matt Norene | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $27,839 |
8 | Bidwell Ranches Inc | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $26,188 |
9 | Candace Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $21,210 |
10 | Lpdb LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $20,646 |
11 | Sugargrass LLC | Dairy, OR 97625 | $20,592 |
12 | Bradshaw Cattle Company LLC | Eagle Point, OR 97524 | $20,349 |
13 | Antelope Creek Cattle Co | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $18,518 |
14 | Thomas Nielsen | Gazelle, CA 96034 | $18,474 |
15 | John B Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $17,675 |
16 | , | $16,172 | |
17 | Mill Creek Ranch | Canadian, TX 79014 | $15,949 |
18 | Susan Knox | Vina, CA 96092 | $15,862 |
19 | Atkinson Angus Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $15,601 |
20 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $15,531 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>