Conservation Reserve Program in Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 21,285
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Colorado totaled $2,019,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Collie Farms Partnership | Arriba, CO 80804 | $1,617,472 |
22 | Edward E & Sheri Jones Jv | Lamar, CO 81052 | $1,599,698 |
23 | Kent Farms Partnership | Tipton, KS 67485 | $1,569,784 |
24 | Diamond J R Farms | Nunn, CO 80648 | $1,542,000 |
25 | Hatcher Land & Cattle Co | Liberal, KS 67901 | $1,509,894 |
26 | Thiessen Farms | Sterling, CO 80751 | $1,433,191 |
27 | Chris E Rundell | Lamar, CO 81052 | $1,425,134 |
28 | Jmb Family Farms | Bethune, CO 80805 | $1,414,056 |
29 | Anchor B Farms Inc | Hooker, OK 73945 | $1,403,034 |
30 | T & L Inc | Vienna, VA 22180 | $1,396,140 |
31 | Keith Montgomery | Olney Springs, CO 81062 | $1,391,309 |
32 | Milton Craig Kerfoot | Eads, CO 81036 | $1,386,328 |
33 | R Lewis Fillmore | Boone, CO 81025 | $1,373,859 |
34 | Kenneth Cronk | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $1,346,856 |
35 | Mike & Jim Kruse Partnership | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $1,343,666 |
36 | Diana J Shelton | Lamar, CO 81052 | $1,338,660 |
37 | J & L Farms Ptr | Eads, CO 81036 | $1,329,569 |
38 | Gilbert Groves | Ordway, CO 81063 | $1,327,767 |
39 | Eastern High Plains Ranch | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $1,312,929 |
40 | Raftopoulos Brothers Livestock | Craig, CO 81625 | $1,310,463 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”