Total Conservation Programs in Colorado, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,099
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Colorado totaled $49,865,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Smith Rancho Land & Livestock LLC | Craig, CO 81626 | $50,729 |
42 | Joanne L Goodrich | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $50,000 |
43 | Marjorie A Kain | Haxtun, CO 80731 | $50,000 |
44 | Chris E Rundell | Lamar, CO 81052 | $50,000 |
45 | R Lewis Fillmore | Boone, CO 81025 | $50,000 |
46 | Marilyn K Goeglein | Yuma, CO 80759 | $50,000 |
47 | Louie E Entz | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $50,000 |
48 | William R Gray | Ordway, CO 81063 | $50,000 |
49 | Sears Irrigated Farms Inc | Joes, CO 80822 | $50,000 |
50 | Pipe Springs Ranch Ltd Liability | Springfield, CO 81073 | $50,000 |
51 | Dona J Fillmore | Pueblo, CO 81008 | $50,000 |
52 | Tyler P Karney | Ordway, CO 81063 | $50,000 |
53 | John Montgomery | Olney Springs, CO 81062 | $50,000 |
54 | Robert E And Patricia A Schmidt Foundation | Hays, KS 67601 | $50,000 |
55 | Don And Peggy Brown Lllp | Yuma, CO 80759 | $50,000 |
56 | John Knoss-john W & Millicent Knoss Jt Rev Tr | Opheim, MT 59250 | $50,000 |
57 | Anchor B Farms Inc | Hooker, OK 73945 | $49,996 |
58 | M & K Templer LLC | Vienna, VA 22180 | $49,910 |
59 | Alfred V Luke | Brighton, CO 80603 | $49,900 |
60 | Gail J Bowman Revocable Trust | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $49,843 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”